You are here: Home / Publications / State Tagging for Improved Earth and Environmental Data Quality Assurance

State Tagging for Improved Earth and Environmental Data Quality Assurance

This paper presents an innovative approach to aid quality assessment of environmental data. The authors used both ECN and Cumbrian Lakes Monitoring data to validate the approach.

Tso, CHM., Henrys, P., Rennie, S. and Watkins, J. (2020). State Tagging for Improved Earth and Environmental Data Quality Assurance. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, -. DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00046.



Visit web page…

Related site(s)

Related protocol(s)

Related organisation(s)


Environmental data allows us to monitor the constantly changing environment that we live in. It allows us to study trends and helps us to develop better models to describe processes in our environment and they, in turn, can provide information to improve management practices. To ensure that the data are reliable for analysis and interpretation, they must undergo quality assurance procedures. Such procedures generally include standard operating procedures during sampling and laboratory measurement (if applicable), as well as data validation upon entry to databases. The latter usually involves compliance (i.e., format) and conformity (i.e., value) checks that are most likely to be in the form of single parameter range tests. Such tests take no consideration of the system state at which each measurement is made, and provide the user with little contextual information on the probable cause for a measurement to be flagged out of range. We propose the use of data science techniques to tag each measurement with an identified system state. The term “state” here is defined loosely and they are identified using k-means clustering, an unsupervised machine learning method. The meaning of the states is open to specialist interpretation. Once the states are identified, state-dependent prediction intervals can be calculated for each observational variable. This approach provides the user with more contextual information to resolve out-of-range flags and derive prediction intervals for observational variables that considers the changes in system states. The users can then apply further analysis and filtering as they see fit. We illustrate our approach with two well-established long-term monitoring datasets in the UK: moth and butterfly data from the UK Environmental Change Network (ECN), and the UK CEH Cumbrian Lakes monitoring scheme. Our work contributes to the ongoing development of a better data science framework that allows researchers and other stakeholders to find and use the data they need more readily.